An obvious manipulation by Fox news. It makes one wonder though: What’s the difference between revolution (v2) and insurrection?
Helping A Brother Out
An obvious manipulation by Fox news. It makes one wonder though: What’s the difference between revolution (v2) and insurrection?
This is one of those cases where the explanation provided makes enough sense that it might actually be true, that it’s a rental house he did not decorate. It’s also worth noting that for many the value of that piece is less that it’s OF Mao than it’s BY Warhol. I don’t care either way, I just see the whole affair as a silly distraction.
I hear you, but: Fox’s explanation does/did not address why it is they heavy cropped the field of view to exclude the art BEFORE they knew it was a rented residence. The point being it is yet another manipulation by the media. A distraction to some, serious shit to those that are trying to determine if a source can be trusted.